| Wrong about what? You may be caught up in your own little thing there bro, got me. Here I am having a discussion and merely backing up my point of view with data that is documented. Yet for some reason you are looking to prove someone wrong, or are desperate not to be proven wrong. I see no proof, proving anything, that you are talking about, seen a couple rather silly points about a car's limits being driver dependant, but even then it has nothing to do with the discussion at hand in the thread. There's a good point about whatever makes a driver feel comfortable, but again, I don't see what thta has to do with Caliguy inquiring about what is involed in upgrading the old system to the new one. In fact he even said he wasn't "looking to rehash deletion arguments", yet here you come doing just that. Everyone here appreciates your opinion on that matter, however as it applies to the discussion at hand, and my point that HICAS certainly is a "major design feature" and not just a gimmick....I, and anyone interested in staying on topic, simply don't give a shit You can try to be as insulting as you like, it's funny to watch members like you get all in a tizzy when someone threatens your little e-turf with a notion that is contrary to what you try to convince people is true and absolute, in fact behavior like this has come to be expected from some of you. If you would like to debate whether the HICAS hurts or helps handling, please by all means start a thread on it. I would be happy to chime in with whatever data/opinions support one side or another.
 Tsk tsk, some people just don't know when to stfu search said you suck (n/m) - Wilks. 01:38:02 09/06/06 |
